How Argentines Must Pay Income Taxes with Cryptocurrencies

Taxes on income stemming from the sale of cryptocurrencies vary, depending on whether they are local or foreign. Since October 2019, exchanges have had to report the transactions by their affiliates.

The incorporation of cryptocurrency taxation in the Income Tax Law through the Tax Reform Act in late 2017 has been in force since 2018. However, this issue still raises endless doubts that the Argentine legislation has not yet answered.

The Law speaks of digital currencies but does not define what users should understand by that concept in legal terms.

Firstly, users should assume that cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, among other cryptocurrencies, fall under the concept of digital currency of the Law. Below there is an explanation of the process to settle/calculate this tax in the case of people.

It is important to clarify that in late 2019 the Income Tax underwent some changes. For instance, the income resulting from the sale of government bonds and other securities listed on the local stock exchange were excluded. However, these changes did not affect digital currencies, which are still taxed.

The settlement of income tax derived from the sale of cryptocurrencies will vary depending on whether the source of the income is Argentine or foreign. According to the Law, cryptocurrencies from Argentina will be those whose issuer is located in the country. Otherwise, these will be from a foreign source.

Regarding digital currencies such as Bitcoin, it is different, since they do not have a centralized issuer but miners distributed worldwide. In this case, it is necessary to clarify when this type of asset is from Argentina.

Currently, there is no legal responsibility to this fundamental aspect of the tax, so this matter is still vague. If the source could be determined, users would have two possibilities.

In the case of Argentine-source income, the tax rate will be 15% when digital currencies are sold in pesos with an adjustment clause or in foreign currency, and 5% when in pesos. The regulation of the Law clarified the latter in late December 2019.

The inconvenience arises when digital currencies are not issued in US dollars or another vcurrency but value ​​in them. This lack of legal clarity makes it difficult for users to settle the tax correctly.

In these cases of Argentine-source income, the tax is calculated independently from traditional income tax, and so it is also known as a scheduled contribution. For example, a person with income from their independent professional activity will pay the tax for that concept in the usual way and, in parallel, will do so for the income generated through their cryptocurrencies. However, the two settlements will be within the same Income Tax, not as two different taxes.

In the case of Foreign-Source Income, the rate will always be 15% but the tax will be calculated differently since it will not be settled the same as in the Argentine-source case. This calculation will be made within the general regime, so the user will have the right to other deductions, but it will be possible to compute them.

By Willmen Blanco

Energy Needed to Mine Bitcoin and Its Expenditure Figures

It is a fact that producing Bitcoin requires using energy. However, there is a debate on how much energy is involved in its mining.

Several times, different means of communication have brought attention to the considerable consumption of electricity by Bitcoin mining processes. This occurred especially after it was published that 98% of Bitcoin drilling platforms will become obsolete before they manage to do anything.

New figures indicate that only one Bitcoin transaction uses the same amount of electricity as a British home for almost two months.

Besides, some people do not even see what the said use of electricity implies as they consider that cryptocurrencies “have no intrinsic value and are useless as a form of exchange.” It should be noted that people like Warren Buffett have been defending this argument.

Ecological Nightmare and Expenditure of Useless Energy?

It is said that cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, can lose their value through fraud or digital manipulation. Those are the general conclusions of the Bank for International Settlements, known as the “Bank of Central Bankers,” based in Switzerland.

While several central banks are examining the possible use of Blockchain technology for payment systems, they have not yet issued their state-controlled cryptocurrencies.

Bitcoin Energy Use in Figures

According to a study conducted by Digiconomist, founded by Alex De Vries, the amount of energy needed to mine cryptocurrencies has soared. To be more exact, it has reached an annual high of 77.78 terawatts per hour (TWh), just like all the electricity consumed in Chile.

To make it easier to understand, the report highlights that the carbon footprint of a single Bitcoin transaction is the same as that of 780,650 Visa transactions or that of spending 52,043 hours watching YouTube.

Apart from the estimates of energy consumption, critics such as Robert Sharratt and the firm CoinShares have strongly questioned the resulting environmental impact (in the form of a carbon footprint).

Specifically, Sharratt used the Coinshares report to argue that the network has a limited environmental impact. Interestingly, the Coinshares mining report only implies that the network has a limited environmental impact. The reason for this is a large proportion of the use of renewable energy, but without the words “carbon footprint” at all.

This omission is important as it ignores that the main energy source in Sichuan (China) comes from coal. This is relevant since this is where miners are primarily located, according to CoinShares.

Additionally, the Technical University of Munich (TUM) conducted an independent study on the environmental impact of the network. Therefore, it concluded that “coal is feeding Bitcoin.” Its weighted emission factor for the entire Bitcoin network is the same as that used to calculate the carbon footprint of the network, based on the Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index.

Certainly, Bitcoin mining is not by far the worst economic activity for the environment. However, all these studies reflect a reality that developers can work through innovation. The challenge for the future of Bitcoin lies in the fact that miners manage to improve their access to renewable energy. In the same way, the objective is to make their mining machines even more efficient.

By Willmen Blanco

Blockchain-Based Platform for Business Registration from Argentina to Be Suspended

The government’s measure will be in force for a period of 180 days, while proceedings are conducted on paper again. The Association of Entrepreneurs of Argentina questioned the decision by saying that it represents a delay.

It was reported that the Argentine government will suspend its blockchain-based platform for the digital registration of companies for at least 180 days. According to the authorities, the measure seeks to establish greater control and rearrange the registration of companies so that the General Inspection of Justice (IGJ) has interference in the process of incorporating companies.

The Simplified Share Corporation (SAS) digital service became operational in 2017, during the management of former President Mauricio Macri, and allows companies to be created in 24 hours instead of in 55 days as in the past. However, Ricardo Nissen, head of the IGJ, stressed that this mechanism does not allow establishing control over the records.

According to Nissen, there is no control to constitute a society today as anyone can decide to do it. He noted that “Macrismo” thought that by enabling the constitution of companies in 24 hours people would receive a lot of investments. However, the official considers that it was not a good idea. It is important to mention that the suspension would take effect after General Resolution 06/2020 is published in the Official Gazette.

Once the digital procedure has been suspended, the interested companies must apply for their registration in paper formats. Applications for changes in headquarters, changes in capitalization, dissolutions, transformations of companies, and the appointment of authorities will also be affected.

The authorities intended to establish centralized physical registration so that third parties can control the protocol, something that was eliminated when adopting distributed registration based on distributed accounting technology (DLT) or blockchain.

The government’s decision was not well received by the Association of Entrepreneurs of Argentina (ASEA), who questioned the measure by labeling it as a delay for the sector. Alejandro Ramírez, responsible for public policies from the aforementioned association, said that the work of entrepreneurs will become more difficult.

Ramírez considers that this decision delays and greatly hinders the work of Argentine entrepreneurs. He says that now they have to return to a nineteenth-century system, which is completely anachronistic and easy to adulterate. In this sense, Argentina is virtually the only country in the world going from a digital system back to a paper format. Not only does this fact threaten the transparency of companies, but it also triples the costs of constituting a society.

Unlike this particular case, the use of cases of distributed and decentralized records is increasing globally. Certification of university diplomas, digital identity, and product traceability are among the many applications of blockchains.

DLT is an original technology of Bitcoin as a digital system that allows two or more people to conduct any type of transaction without the participation of intermediaries. The data are recorded in a distributed way in the network and cannot be modified, that is, they are immutable.

By Alexander Salazar

Cryptocurrencies Might Be Being Used to Finance Organized Crime in Latin America

A report states that criminals plan scams and money laundering in cryptocurrency wallets. The alliance of drug cartels and hackers is considered an emerging threat.

Organized crime in Latin America might be being financed with cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC), according to a report published by the intelligence and security firm Intsights. In the text, it is noted that criminals are using platforms such as Localbitcoins, Paxful or Ccoins to launder large amounts of money and plan scams.

It is stated in the document entitled “The dark side of Latin America: cryptocurrencies, cartels, carding and the rise of cybercrime,” it is stated that very few countries have established laws to counteract money laundering. According to the investigators, this situation is leading those involved to use unregulated exchange sites or those with weak Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) protocols.

The report explains that the financing of threats is evolving in Latin America as organized crime groups turn to cryptocurrencies to launder large amounts of money and dive into the dark web to find and hire hackers. The document also reports that Latin American countries lead the list of the worst money laundering nations in the world.

Concerning the transactions in Localbitcoins, Paxful and Ccoins, the investigation indicates that criminals prefer using these types of P2P platforms rather than the services of centralized cryptocurrency exchanges. The reason for that is that these exchanges “generally lack AML programs and perform little or no due diligence at KYC.”

Among other methods that criminals might be using for money laundering is that of cryptocurrency mixing. It should be stated that it is a commission service offered by various platforms in which potentially detectable funds are combined with others to make it more difficult to determine their origin.

A fact that Intsights disclosed is that 97% of the cryptocurrencies that are bleached eventually go to countries that have weak KYC/AML regulations. The firm also mentioned that Latin American nations lead this list and it identified a growing threat from the alliance of drug cartels and hackers.

New Guidelines

The Intsights study fully covers 2019, a year when cryptocurrency wallets such as Localbitcoins announced that they would establish new security mechanisms for the verification of their users’ identities. In February last year, the exchange site indicated that it would comply with European legislation, such as the 5th Directive against money laundering.

Regarding Paxful, the company established in April last year KYC protocols for operators that used its exchange platform. Besides, the Ccoins service also requires KYC/AML to operate, but in this case, the exchange volumes are significantly lower than in the cases of Localbitcoins and Paxful.

In its report, Intsights highlighted the issue of cybersecurity in Latin America, but it has no offices in the region to deal with it. For this investigation, it conducted a collaborative work jointly with the cybersecurity companies CipherTrace and Scitum. The method used for the investigation included the analysis of restricted databases, dark web sources, and conversations on messaging platforms used by hackers.

By Alexander Salazar

Buyers Scarce on Petro’s new P2P Platform although Offers Abound

Registered users with wallets in Criptolago have an announcement board to offer petros. Because of the oversupply and low interest in buying, some users choose to sell off their PTR funds.

Currently, hundreds of Venezuelans are seeking an alternative that allows them to exchange or sell their funds in Petro (PTR). The Venezuelan exchange Criptolago announced, last February 27th, that it had enabled the peer-to-peer (P2P) trading of the government’s cryptocurrency project.

However, it seems as though the initiative has not provided an effective solution, given the low interest in buying observed on the platform.

The registered and verified users that own wallets in Criptolago can now transfer their funds in PTR from PetroApp to their wallet on the Venezuelan platform. From there, they can offer them for sale or purchase, when an interested party accepts the offer, an agreement is reached.

This is a P2P market where people go to buy and trade or exchange the government’s cryptocurrency. It is observed on the billboard that some offers have been made starting from 0.1 PTR, the minimum amount allowed to trade. It should be noted that the transactions on the platform have a cost of 2%.

As soon as Criptolago announced that it had enabled the P2P trading of PTR, some offers began to arrive. According to the system, in less than 48 hours more than 260 offers, mostly for sale, have been uploaded. Due to the oversupply and low interest in buying, some users choose to sell off their PTR funds.

The average rate observed on the billboard is of about 1,800,000 bolivars (VES) per unit, even though the Patria (Homeland) system, the platform used by the Venezuelan government to provide subsidies, indicates that the value reached VES 4,043,700.42.

A user requested the exchange to minimize speculation and display the complete book of orders, in addition to the full volume for each pair of cryptocurrencies. He also wants the financial institution to accelerate the time of fiat funding and withdrawal of the wallet, and to expand the P2P exchange to more peers.

Several users also asked Criptolago administrators to restore the purchase of Bitcoin with Petro, which was active until recently and was canceled for unknown reasons. The option still can be seen on the platform, but it is active for the exchange of Bitcoin for Petro, which has created confusion among those interested in this option.

According to other comments, the new Criptolago’s P2P trading proves that Petro is not achieving the objective for which it was created since it cannot be used as a means of payment or exchange due to the few available options. Before reserving it as a long-term savings method, many Venezuelans prefer to exchange their PTR funds for the devalued VES, which implies losing more than 50% of its official value.

Last April 2018, President Nicolás Maduro announced the names of 16 exchanges in which transactions with PTR could be conducted, but not all of them are operational. However, there are still some options, such as Antwerp, where PTR can be exchanged for other cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dash and Ether.

Last January, several users registered on the LocalBitcoins and Hodl Hodl exchange platforms published P2P sale and purchase announcements with PTR. The emergence of exchanges with PTR in foreign crypto exchanges caught people’s attention as their trading, driven by the Maduro’s government, was theoretically limited to a handful of Venezuelan exchanges.

By Alexander Salazar

Bank of England Warns Cryptocurrencies Could Affect Credit Creation

The institution wants regulators and other central banks to be prepared for the “risks” associated with the emerging cryptocurrency ecosystem.

The launch of more cryptocurrencies, the adoption of these types of digital assets, and a cryptocurrency economy could eliminate bank credit issuance. That is what Jon Cuncliffe, deputy governor for Financial Stability of the United Kingdom’s central bank, the Bank of England (BoE) affirmed.

In this sense, Cuncliffe opines that the integration of stablecoins on social media platforms may lead people to decide to save the money they have in banks on digital currencies as stablecoins. They could store these assets in wallets and not in banks.

“In such a world and depending on how and whether stablecoins were backed with other financial assets, the supply of credit to the real economy through the banking system could become weaker or indeed disappear. That would be a change with profound economic consequences”, Jon Cuncliffe commented.

Cuncliffe, the British envoy to the European Union, added that digital currencies pose “very important questions” for the government of the United Kingdom, regulators of that country, and the Bank of England. He highlighted that the role of the Bank of England is ensuring that the U.K.’s money “works safely and reliably”.

A Recent Similar Case

This opinion of the BoE’s representative comes after the Central Bank of Ukraine expressed its concerns regarding the issue of Central Bank Digital Currencies even though this bank is working in its digital currency, e-Hryvnia, which would be supported by the national currency.

The Central Bank of Ukraine has joined work teams to investigate cryptocurrencies, but now it is not very sure of issuing its digital asset or not. The institution fears that issuing a cryptocurrency could be “the source of financial instability that can greatly affect Ukrainian private banks”.

Although the e-Hryvnia project could bring benefits such as reducing the amount of paper money and increasing public confidence in these types of assets, the Central Bank of Ukraine decided to stop the project to analyze it.

Benefits of Stablecoins

The representative of the Central Bank of England recognized that stablecoins could offer different benefits, including “very large reductions in the costs of payments, especially cross border”, and “greater financial inclusion through easier and cheaper access to payment services for the ‘unbanked” people.

Besides, transactions made using blockchain technology would be faster than the operations conducted traditional processes. Operations with blockchain will not be modified later.

The BoE official said that the current financial system comprising “the equivalent of 18th-century bank clerks with quill pens altering their banks’ ledgers to debit one account and credit another”.

The British envoy informed that the Financial Stability Board (FSB) will issue a report examining “regulatory recommendations concerning stablecoins” this year.

However, the Bank of England, as an institution, hopes to be sure before issuing any digital asset.

Cincliffe urged regulators and central banks to be prepared for the challenges and “risks” associated with the emerging cryptocurrency ecosystem before it becomes “systemically important”.

Some weeks ago, Randal K. Quarles, President of FSB, announced that the organization is working on evaluating vulnerabilities in the financial system to prevent future inconveniences.

By María Rodríguez