Cayman Islands vs. Bahamas: how the FTX scandal affected both jurisdictions. The regulatory landscape and tax benefits of the Cayman Islands. Importance of transparency and reputation in offshore financial services.

The FTX scandal, conceived in the Bahamas, left investors grappling with legal battles, trying to recover funds from the collapsing company. As a consequence, the reputation of the Bahamas has taken a hit, with negative publicity and fear, uncertainty and doubt casting a shadow over the island nation. Meanwhile, the Cayman Islands have emerged as a crypto-friendly alternative, attracting more businesses and Blockchain startups.

After the notorious collapse of FTX, the jurisdiction of the Bahamas has been tainted by controversy. The arrest of Sam Bankman-Fried in January further intensified the scrutiny, prompting some to question the country’s regulatory framework.

This has raised concerns that the Bahamas could face difficulties in attracting new investment and maintaining its status as a competitive offshore jurisdiction in the financial services sector.

Despite the FTX scandal, the Bahamas has taken steps to improve financial regulations and attract legitimate business. The introduction of the DARE Bill in 2020 marked significant progress towards a comprehensive regulatory framework for the digital asset sector.

Impact of the DARE Bill on the Digital Asset Landscape

The DARE bill sets out licensing requirements, compliance obligations, and reporting standards for digital asset businesses. It also provides guidelines on consumer protection, anti-money laundering, as well as the fight against the financing of terrorism.

By implementing this bill, The Bahamas has demonstrated its commitment to fostering a secure and transparent environment for businesses, investors, and users of digital assets.

Without a doubt, the FTX fiasco has dealt a heavy blow to the reputation of the Bahamas as an offshore financial center. As long as FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried remain in the spotlight, that likely won’t change.

Cayman Islands: A Blockchain Haven?

On the other hand, the Cayman Islands have earned a reputation as a crypto-friendly jurisdiction. With at least 58 Blockchain companies now based there, including prominent firms like, this British Overseas Territory has positioned itself as a desirable location for Blockchain entities.

Key factors contributing to this attractiveness include strong regulation, tax neutrality, and a skilled workforce.

When it comes to regulations, the Cayman Islands excels. His government has put in place clear and comprehensive guidelines for blockchain companies, such as the Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) regime.

This creates a stable environment for growth, as evidenced by the successful launch of numerous Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) in the region. By comparison, the regulatory landscape in the Bahamas remains somewhat murky, leading to confusion and apprehension among potential investors.

Both the Bahamas and the Cayman Islands have duty-free environments, which attract companies to set up shop within their borders. These jurisdictions do not impose corporate, capital gains or income taxes, making them attractive options for companies looking to minimize the tax burden. However, the Cayman Islands’ stronger reputation and regulatory clarity give it a slight advantage in this regard.

Finally, the Cayman Islands has a skilled workforce, with professionals well-versed in Blockchain technology and financial services. As the demand for experts in these fields grows, the jurisdiction remains well-equipped to meet the needs of Blockchain companies.

In conclusion, the Cayman Islands seem to have the advantage, compared to the Bahamas. Its clear regulatory framework, skilled workforce, and strong reputation as a cryptocurrency-friendly jurisdiction make it a more attractive option for Blockchain companies and startups.

By Audy Castaneda


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here