Tax Expert Says Buying Crypto Is Not a Taxable Event

Buying cryptocurrency with fiat or any “unrealized appreciation” is not a taxable event according to Thomas Shea, a cryptocurrency tax executive at EY.

Thomas Shea, cryptocurrency tax lead at EY Financial Services, told Cointelegraph that the taxability of cryptocurrencies is an evolving area and new regulations may be in place soon. “There is new legislation that will require reporting for at least some crypto transactions, and when those rules go into effect there will be significant changes,” Shea said.

The EY executive noted that with the growing popularity of cryptocurrencies, lawmakers are continually exploring how to generate revenue by taxing and regulating digital assets.

Shea adds that “We are seeing certain jurisdictions develop exclusive regimes, rates and reporting for digital assets. In the US, we are seeing that digital assets are subject to rules and reporting is generally limited to securities (and not property).”

While not many may appreciate the taxation of their crypto assets, according to Shea, understanding the changing tax impacts associated with cryptocurrencies is crucial. The tax expert advises that participants in the market be aware of the “scope of their transactions that will possibly trigger a taxable event and the associated reporting requirements.”

According to Shea, buying or selling cryptocurrency influences whether or not it is taxable. The purchase of cryptocurrencies with fiat and any unrealized appreciation are not taxable events. However, the tax executive notes that selling your crypto is a taxable event. It explains that “the gain or loss is generally of an equity nature” and this could be subject to tax.

Taxable Events and What to Do

The EY administrator notes that even if a holder exchanges their crypto for other assets such as Bitcoin (BTC) or Ethereum (ETH), this gives users a “taxable event” and they are required to report gains or losses on the discontinued crypto.”

The same goes for non-fungible tokens (NFTs). “If you bought an NFT with fiat, there is no taxable event,” says Shea. However, buying NFTs with cryptocurrencies is treated much the same as exchanging cryptocurrencies for cryptocurrencies. “Gross income minus your tax base on the asset, which typically includes all associated fees/costs,” says the crypto-tax expert.

The EY executive urges people to seek guidance from appropriate advisers once they are aware of their tax obligations.

“In an industry where technology serves as the architectural framework, having an advisor with a technological solution to go with you, as well as understanding of your goals, will allow you to make the best possible decisions to minimize your tax burden.”

What Happens Around the World

PWC published a global crypto-asset tax report in 2021, evaluating and reviewing key developments in digital asset tax guidance, which had an accelerated pace that year.

This report highlights that Liechtenstein, Australia, Malta, Germany, Singapore, Switzerland, and Hong Kong are the countries with the most comprehensive guidance regarding the taxation of crypto assets. The document also notes that one of the most important factors in determining how tax rules apply to cryptocurrencies is how they classify under local tax law. It is worth noting that almost all tax jurisdictions have issued a guide, where they view crypto assets as a form of property (intangible assets).

One example is Thailand, where cryptocurrency traders are exempt from the 7% value-added tax on licensed exchanges. Traders within the country will also be able to offset losses against profits annually.

Another example is the Indian government, which in February proposed a 30% income tax on crypto income. However, many opposed the proposal, as a 30% crypto tax is nearly double corporate tax rates, which hover around 16%.

The truth is that the whole world faces numerous challenges in regard to cryptocurrency transactions, and what is taxable.

In addition to tax and money laundering issues, it is necessary to consider the adaptation of civil, commercial, corporate legislation or the protection of personal data to the new business models that involve crypto assets.

It seems a priority, then, that countries have access to information on these operations.

By Audy Castaneda

Japan Asks Crypto Exchanges in its Country to Cooperate in Sanctions against Russia

Lawmakers in Japan have requested cryptocurrency exchanges not to deal with transactions linked to Russia and Belarus. Those making unauthorized payments in crypto to those countries will face up to three years in prison or a fine of $8,500.

Lawmakers in Japan called on their country’s digital currency exchanges to have a more cooperative stance regarding the sanctions applied against Russia. The request arrived as governments became more interested in how digital assets can help avoid sanctions.

The Japanese government specifically demanded cryptocurrency exchanges to play a more significant role in the punitive actions taken against Russia for its attacks over Ukraine. Reuters reported that the government asked crypto exchanges not to deal with cryptocurrency transactions for Russia and Belarus, in harmony with the package of economic punishments.

The request arrived after a meeting held by G7 members, who awoken concerns that Russians on the sanctions list could apply digital assets as a tool to circumvent the impact of economic sanctions over their finances.

The request specifically highlighted that the member nations of the Group of 7 would apply costs on illicit Russian actors who use crypto to save and transfer their wealth. The US Treasury also launched new guidance assuring that the sanctions included digital currencies.

Along with Japan’s new measures, those who make unauthorized payments to the individuals or entities targeted by the sanctions will have to deal with a prison term of up to three years or a fine valued at 1 million yen, about 8,500 US dollars. It is worth noting that non-fungible tokens, NFTs, were also considered a payment method.

Crypto and Sanctions over Russia

Cryptocurrencies became a hot topic amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, with many administrations worried about how crypto might become a way out for the Russians.

The exchanges reacted to the requests initially made by Ukrainian authorities. Notably, Kraken exchange CEO Jesse Powell said he would need a solid legal reason to carry out this procedure.

However, other networks suspended the service altogether; one of these platforms was Trezor. In the case of Binance, the company released a statement saying that they are applying the same sanctions rules as banks according to international agreements.

For its part, Coinbase said technology in the crypto industry could serve as a tool to ensure more effective sanctions compliance. In illicit acts, it has already suspended at least 25,000 wallets linked to Russians.

Coinbase explained that it maintains an improved Blockchain analytics protocol to identify high-risk behavior and focus on studying every emerging threat; it also develops new mitigations. It means that Coinbase focuses on mapping transactions beyond the entities and individuals targeted by governments.

By: Jenson Nuñez

23-Year-Old Australian Buys $314,000 Property through Planned Crypto Investments

Loi Nguyen began his journey as an investor in 2017 by buying a few hundred dollars worth of BTC, ETH, and traditional stocks. In November 2021, his cryptocurrency investments exceeded his entire stock portfolio.

A young resident of Queensland, Australia played the long game of accumulating Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) for several years to finally beat the rise in property prices during the 2020 rally and own his dream home.

His interest in cryptocurrencies reached new glory while studying Economics. He commented that “cryptocurrencies came back into my life when I took a course in college on inflation. Know that Bitcoin can be disinflationary.”

Speaking to news.com.au, Nguyen revealed that the lower interest rates (less than 0.5%) offered by traditional banks could never help break into the real estate market. Following a dollar-cost averaging (DCA) investment tactic, the feckless investor continued to diversify his crypto portfolio amid the temporary bear market of 2018. He acknowledged having taken many risks. He said that “I wanted to protect my purchasing power, protect my current savings, and make sure my money wasn’t in short supply.”

What Nguyen Did

When traditional markets crashed during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Nguyen’s cryptocurrency investments exceeded the value of his stock portfolio. That is when his investment focus shifted away from traditional markets towards cryptocurrencies, eventually amassing 1 BTC over several months.

In order to buy real estate, Nguyen cashed out his cryptocurrency investments during November-December 2021, a timeline in which BTC hit an all-time high of $69,000. In total, the young Australian sold less than half of his cryptocurrency portfolio, leaving him with around $31,400 (A$ 43,000) to give to the bank as part of the down payment.

Nguyen bought a one-bedroom apartment in Brisbane, which was priced at USD 314,000 (A$430,000) and required approximately USD 62,735 (A$ 86,000) as a down payment. “About half of that was made up of cryptocurrencies,” Nguyen added.

After finishing high school, Nguyen worked full-time for a year as a bank teller, but earned a low salary of about $20,400. “I’m much better now,” he concluded.

Australian Advisory Council Lists Key Factors to Facilitate Cryptocurrency Adoption

Australia’s cyber security advisory, the Cyber ​​Security Industry Advisory Committee, recently highlighted numerous opportunities specific to the crypto space.

As Cointelegraph reported, the study titled Exploring Cryptocurrencies supports the need for a regulatory framework to achieve greater clarity and trust regarding cryptocurrencies for the Australian market.

The federal advisory recommends exploring four key areas that can “help ensure the safe adoption of cryptocurrencies in Australia,” which are minimum cybersecurity standards, capabilities (awareness through specialized training), as well as a “follow the leader” approach and operator transparency.

Regarding minimum cybersecurity standards, Jonathon Miller, managing director of the Kraken cryptocurrency exchange in Australia, believes these and “more resources to fight sophisticated cybercrime will go a long way in protecting investors.”

As for capabilities, the Cybersecurity Industry Advisory Committee recommends raising public awareness through the education of professionals on the available possibilities of cryptocurrencies and related cybercrimes and threats. This takes us to a “follow the lead” approach where Australia learns and implements international best practices in the field of cryptocurrencies.

Finally, considering the pseudo-anonymity inherent in cryptocurrencies, the committee calls for increased transparency regarding registered cryptocurrency exchanges and Blockchain companies.

Overall, cryptocurrencies entail a huge potential for people like Nguyen, who in other circumstances might not be able to make their dreams come true.

By Audy Castaneda

The Behavior of the Bitcoin Whales in March and How It Has Influenced BTC

The whales moved 51,561 BTC from exchanges to unknown wallets and 30,769 BTC vice versa. However, those short-term holders transferred 7,475 BTC between the former platforms and 3,320 BTC between peers.

The Bitcoin whales have recently moved 93,125 BTC through 40 transactions, with significant trend reversals. In early March, the introduction of liquidity in the market prevailed, but that is not the case at the moment. The following weekly analysis shows the details and the influence that the whales may have had on the performance of Bitcoin.

Over the last week, the Bitcoin whales have withdrawn BTC liquidity from the market after March 10th. The analysis of their activity will allow assessing in detail how those long-term holders have moved the pioneering cryptocurrency.

It is necessary to contextualize that activity to better dig into the status of the whales and the market as a whole. However, this is only a micro approach to one of the many factors that can influence the performance of BTC.

Weekly Analysis of the Activity of the Bitcoin Whales

The predominant trend in the activity of the Bitcoin whales in the last week was accumulation. In that regard, they moved 51,561 BTC from exchanges to unknown wallets, equivalent to 55.37% of the weekly total.

The second-highest trend in the behavior of the whales was the introduction of liquidity to the market. They moved 30,769 BTC from unknown wallets to exchanges, representing 33.04% of the weekly total. That trend prevailed earlier in the week when the market struggled to prevent Bitcoin from pulling back.

The transfer between exchanges was the third-highest trend, as the whales moved 7,475 BTC, equivalent to 8.02% of the weekly total. Finally, those long-term holders transferred 3,320 BTC between unknown wallets, representing 3.57%.

On March 11th, a whale moved 24,000 BTC through an over-the-counter (OTC) transaction. However, that operation seems not to have affected the performance of Bitcoin much.

The Performance of Bitcoin Over the Last Seven Days

Bitcoin is trading at around USD 38,722.99 and has accumulated a 0.85% loss over the last week. That means there was also a pullback after the attempt to break above USD 42,500 and hold above it.

Although the highest trend of the Bitcoin whales in the last week was accumulation, there was another pullback. The vote of the parliamentarians of the European Union (EU) for a regulation that would ban Bitcoin could be one of the reasons.

An update in the draft law seeks to limit cryptocurrencies due to the intensive use of energy to mine them through the Proof-of-Work (PoW) method. Although the vote remains close, a slim majority of committee members may vote against the measure.

Monitoring technical indicators and news like the vote of the EU Parliament allows predicting what could happen with BTC. Several technical indicators indicate a weekly and daily selling trend in the market. In addition, investors should stay informed about what is happening in the cryptocurrency market before deciding to buy.

By Alexander Salazar

Austin, Texas Mayor Embraces Web3 Technology and Cryptocurrency Payments

Austin, the second fastest-growing city in Texas will begin exploring policy capabilities to accept Bitcoin as a payment option and integrate other Web3 applications to improve the lives of its residents.

Steve Adler, Mayor in Austin, Texas, has fully embraced the discovery of what Blockchain technology and crypto payments can bring to his city by proposing two new initiatives.

Adler’s First Initiative

The first initiative aims to ensure that the fourth largest city in Texas promotes the benefits of Blockchain technologies as well as “equity, diversity, accessibility, and inclusion” in the technological ecosystem. To that end, Mayor Adler directed the city manager to explore how the city can use Web3 and Blockchain in 20 fields, from smart contracts, supply chain management, and issuance of arts, media, fundraising, and identity verification.

As stated by Adler, “The city manager must ensure that the city helps create an environment within the city government and in the community at large that supports the creation and development of new technologies, including, but not limited to, Blockchain and other technologies, protocols, and applications related to Web3.”

Adler’s Second Initiative

Mayor Adler’s second initiative directs the city manager to conduct a “fact-finding study” into how the city could adopt Bitcoin (BTC) and cryptocurrency-related policies. Through these efforts, Mayor Adler appears to want to find ways for Austin residents to legally pay their bills using cryptocurrency. Quoted on Twitter, Adler stated that, “Austin is excited to support the businesses and innovations that will turn the promises of Web3, cryptocurrency, and Blockchain technology into reality.”

Under this initiative, the city manager must find ways to allow “the acceptance of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies as payment for municipal taxes, fees, and fines” as the first set of policies to analyze.

What Next

The success of the two initiatives will depend on the level of impact the new apps have on the daily lives of Austinites. The city council will be voting on the proposals on March 24.

The Austin City Council has been considering Blockchain technology integrations since at least 2020 when it proposed using smart contracts for the MyPass identity verification protocol.

Other US Cities Join the Trend

Austin is joining Miami, New York City, and the state of Colorado in rapidly expanding exploration efforts and proposed implementation of cryptocurrency-related policies. Miami and New York have already launched their own citywide coin projects through City Coin on the Stacks layer 1 Blockchain, while Austin’s own program is still in development.

Philadelphia has expressed interest in joining the City Coins program, while Colorado Governor Jared Polis said in an interview on Feb. 15 that the state would accept crypto for “state tax-related purposes.” It later hopes to accept crypto for a broader range of state government services.

By Audy Castaneda

No Crypto for Criminals: Coinjoin BTC Mixing Tool to Block Illicit Transactions

Wasabi Wallet’s founder called the decision a major setback for Bitcoin’s fungibility, while one of the developers advocated using other privacy coordinators instead of zkSNACK.

CoinJoin is a protocol implemented to improve the privacy and anonymity of Bitcoin users, which consists of unifying in the same set all the transactions carried out by different users of the system. Thus, these transactions, once unified, no user can determine where the funds come from, as no one can see or associate the inputs and outputs of said transactions. Thus, not even the receiver of a transaction could tell from where he received the transferred funds.

CoinJoin, a popular Bitcoin (BTC) mixing tool, will block transactions associated with or marked as illegal. The announcement came from the official Wasabi Wallet Twitter account, of which Coinjoin is a part: “The zkSNACKs coordinator will start refusing certain UTXOs from registering to coinjoins.”

The official announcement highlighted that the CoinJoin services would begin blocking certain unspent transaction outputs (UTXOs) from their recording in CoinJoin with the help of the zkSNACK coordinator (a virtual machine used to mix source transactions).

Privacy-focused matching tools are primarily used to hide the origin of transactions and are often seen as a means of laundering illicit funds. However, Blockchain is a public ledger, and with various forensic tools developed by Chainalysis, money laundering through mixing tools has become quite difficult in recent years.

The Announcement: Rafe’s Reaction

The firm’s latest announcement angered many privacy advocates who accused the privacy-focused wallet of bowing to law enforcement. However, a Wasabi developer going by the name Rafe on Twitter explained that they have not committed to their core values, but instead must adhere to certain benchmarks: “No one has infiltrated Wasabi, since we wouldn’t be having this conversation if that were the case. There is no need to spy when banning inputs. Many would be happy to sink with the ship when needed. Is it better to have no zkSNACKs coordinator or to keep it running for majority?”

Rafe also noted that the UTXO blocking is limited to the ZkSNACK coordinator and people using any other coordinator can still feel private and secure. However, Adam Fiscor, the founder of the Wasabi wallet, acknowledged that blacklisting has reached the privacy wallet, and believes that it could be a threat to the fungibility of Bitcoin.

Cryptocurrencies and Illicit Activities: Are they Related?

Most governments and centralized entities have perpetuated a narrative about the use of cryptocurrencies for illicit activities and the role of privacy wallets and blending tools in helping them. However, research and data analysis have shown from time to time that the use of cryptocurrencies for illicit activities comprises a very small fraction of total transaction activity and has been in a steady decline with the advent of more powerful analytical tools.

According to data from Chainalysis, the illicit portion of all crypto transaction volume has decreased to 0.15% in 2021.

The recent arrest of the marital duo found to be trying to launder money from the multi-billion dollar Bitfinex hack is another prominent example, where not only were the hackers caught while trying to launder the stolen funds, the authorities managed to recover most of the hacked BTC as well.

By Audy Castaneda