FTX Debtors Solve Complex Dispute Over Asset Distributions

FTX debtors have resolved claims that clients have made that their assets are property and should be given preference over unsecured creditors. The court’s approval would make creditors of FTX.com and FTX US eligible for 90% of the estate’s distributable assets during a modified schedule. Former FTX engineering chief Nishad Singh said Sam Bankman-Fried was aware of FTX’s financial problems before its bankruptcy in mid-November 2022.

FTX debtors agreed to a new Customer Deficit Settlement after months of negotiations with FTX’s Unsecured Creditors Committee, an ad hoc committee of customers outside the United States, and other representatives.

The court must approve the proposal that the FTX exchange Debtors will present as part of their Amended Plan in December.

FTX Debtor Chief Celebrates Creditor Agreement

Earlier this year, creditors of FTX.com and FTX US filed customer ownership litigation, arguing that they should be given priority over unsecured creditors. The new plan follows FTX’s announcement to liquidate more than $3 billion in crypto assets to compensate clients.

The amendment, if approved by the court, would see creditors of FTX.com and FTX US receive 90% of the debtors’ distributable assets during a new schedule. However, debtors expect that FTX.com customers will suffer a higher percentage of loss and that their final refunds will need to take into account taxes and other government regulations.

Still, the plan represents a milestone in the plan to win back FTX customers, according to FTX restructuring chief John Ray III, who was reportedly pleased with the terms of the settlement, stating that “together, beginning in the most challenging financial disaster I have ever seen, the debtors and their creditors have created immense value from a situation that could easily have been an almost total loss for customers.”

The modified plan involves dividing assets into three pools: segregated assets for the benefit of FTX.com clients, US clients, and a general pool of other assets. However, only the first two groups are included in the Deficit Claim.

The bankruptcy estate has invited customers to make inquiries about the proposed Customer Deficit Settlement. FTX Debtors will present the proposal to the court on December 16. Despite this positive development, FTX debtors warn that clients of both exchanges will likely not receive full payment, and FTX.com could experience a higher percentage of losses.

FTX filed for bankruptcy on November 11, 2022, after a leaked balance sheet from its market maker, Alameda Research (Alameda), exposed the latter’s dependence on the illiquid FTT token. Its former CEO, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), was later accused of allowing FTX to borrow unlimited amounts of funds from FTX clients.

Does Sam Bankman-Fried Have Anything to Do with FTX’s Balance Sheet?

Witnesses at the Bankman-Fried trial argued that SBF changed FTX’s code to allow Alameda an unlimited line of credit. On Monday, former FTX engineering director Nishad Singh said Bankman-Fried knew details. He had long known about the $8 billion shortfall in client funds. Which FTX had due to its risky loans to Alameda. This factor ultimately caused the company to go bankrupt. Last week, former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison testified how Bankman-Fried asked her to prepare balance sheets, especially for creditors who manipulated the values ​​of assets and liabilities.

Additionally, Gary Wang, former CTO of FTX, later testified how Bankman-Fried asked him to change the code, especially FTX, to grant special privileges to Alameda.

By Leonardo Pérez

Nishad Singh Recounts Meetings with Sam Bankman-Fried

Another witness who testified against Sam Bankman-Fried was Nishad Singh. He recounted his panicky encounters with the boss.

Testimony continues this week in Manhattan court in the case of former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried. The turn to speak was for the former head of engineering of that cryptocurrency exchange, Nishad Singh.

Like last week’s testimony, Singh’s came after a plea deal. The engineer pleaded guilty to committing crimes and, in exchange for testifying against his former boss, he could receive benefits.

Recent testimony, especially that of Caroline Ellison, former director of Alameda Research, seems to bury SBF’s hopes. The latter is accused of 7 charges and faces the possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison for the FTX case.

Meetings with Sam Bankman-Fried

During his statements, the former executive said that until the meetings with Sam Bankman-Fried he did not have much knowledge of what was happening. He said he started noticing problems after an internal company chat on Signal, which included him, Caroline Ellison, and Gary Wang.

FTX’s high public relations costs were discussed in the chat. Then Singh learned that Alameda had borrowed $13 billion from FTX of users’ money. Upon learning this information, Singh requested a meeting with the chief.

The meeting took place on a company floor in the Bahamas and lasted for just over an hour. In it, the head of the company told Singh that there was no reason to be worried. Likewise, he clarified that, as long as the company continued to grow, the money owed would arrive.

In the story, the former engineering chief said that Sam Bankman-Fried’s attempts to gloss over the situation ended when he told him about the $13 billion loan. He then asked what the deficit was, to which SBF told him that was the wrong question. Instead, it would be better to ask what is being done to fill that gap.

In that same meeting he told him that he would travel through the Middle East and could raise $5 billion or probably more in the coming weeks or months. Other alternatives would be the arrival of more money from investors. SBF told him that the firm would launch new futures products in the United States.

The Second Panic Meeting

After the Middle East trip arrived, Singh requested a new meeting with the CEO. At that point, he expressed that he had the idea of ​​quitting, but instead asked for a real idea of ​​how things were after the trip.

He relates that SBF informed him that it was still possible to obtain an additional $5 billion. However, Singh wanted to know what the plan was to fill the remainder of the $13 billion owed. It was then that Sam Bankman-Fried told him that the main plan is for FTX to remain successful. In that sense, he told Singh that he was one of the main people in charge of making that happen.

The company’s former head of engineering describes that SBF was highly nervous during that meeting. Quoted by CNBC, he comments that he remembers him being angry and with his hands behind him, grinding his teeth frequently.

Singh is one of the main accused in the fraud case and before the deal was facing 6 criminal charges, one less than SBF. He told the jury that he faces a max of 75 years in prison but is “hoping for no jail time.”

By Audy Castaneda

A First “Legal Blockchain Passport” for Diamond Traceability

0

A stroke of Belgian brilliance: The companies ITraceIT and Logion have developed a joint tracking solution to legally record and document each stage of a diamond’s life.

Coming from the country that is home to the world center of the rough and polished diamond trade, it was natural to expect an exemplary display. The jewelry industry is often singled out for its lack of transparency, governance or sustainability.

These turbulent times due to wars at the gates of Europe and the Mediterranean revive the notion of war diamonds, a symbol of the violation of human rights. However, unlike other products whose supply chain is completely delimited, from the farm to the plate, from the assembly plant to the private garage, in the case of diamonds, there is still no traceability from the mine to the jeweler.

Although the issue of traceability in the sector and possible sanctions is not new, with Russian diamonds in the spotlight, G7 leaders have been searching since May for a tool to more effectively control this trade.

The De Croo government recently mentioned a blockchain-based solution, while the World Diamond Council expressed its preference for the certification system still based on the paper trail (Kimberley Process, 2003).

Even considered unforgeable, the paper certificate constitutes a system based on trust and whose solidity depends on the weakest link, Hans Merket, researcher at the International Peace Information Service (IPIS), reminded RTBF.

“A Strong Letter in Court”

The Belgian company ITraceIT, which aims to be the first tracking tool that centralizes all the data relating to the trajectory of a diamond, has developed a true digital passport: its software collects all the testimonies, photographs or videos of the precious stone in its raw state, purchase invoices, transportation. receipts and other certificates.

Without a doubt, this achievement is only possible if all actors in the value chain play within the rules, although the technological solution built by the Hennuyère company would reinforce validity and authenticity of the information.

“We were the first company to map every stage of a diamond’s life using a single passport. Thanks to Logion’s public blockchain technology, we are now adding the ability to legally record and document all of these steps,” says Frederik Degryse, CEO of ITraceIT. “This legal seal is neutral but conclusive in a court of law. Thus, our passport responds to the economic reality that the G7 is creating today in the diamond sector.”

With their complementary approaches, ITraceIT and Logion seemed like a natural fit. It was through the financial arm of the Walloon government, the Wallonie Entreprendre investment fund (formerly W.IN.G), that this first “blockchain legal passport” for the diamond industry was born.

The Blockchain that Legalizes Tokens

The Logion company has been carrying out an innovative project for two years that usually stands out in a cryptographic ecosystem where purists opt for disintermediation. In fact, it has created a decentralized public network in which “legal officials” (lawyers, bailiffs, notaries) intervene to confer “proof of law” to the tokens, transforming them into legal digital assets.

Logion issues a blockchain certificate, confidentially collecting all the necessary data and carrying out, with its network of legal professionals, the necessary verifications. Thus, the platform guarantees the legitimacy and opposability of the tokens, bridging the gap between the digital and physical domains.

In short, it is a first commercial solution already adapted to the new traceability protocol that the G7 intends to impose on the diamond sector starting next year.

By Leonardo Pérez

Cryptocurrency Mining Ban Removed from Pennsylvania Bill

The Pennsylvania House representative behind the project said he had to remove the ban due to pressure from different unions. According to the politician, this measure, which was intended to be a relief for the environment, received “chronic opposition” from the construction unions. The mining process requires the use of a lot of energy and, as a result, has raised concerns about its environmental impact.

A representative to the Pennsylvania House removed the ban on cryptocurrency mining that was provided in a bill for a period of 2 years. The politician assured that the decision was made after pressure from workers’ unions.

US Representative Greg Vitali introduced a bill some time ago with a two-year cryptocurrency mining ban clause. The objective was to regulate the energy consumption of the sector and minimize the environmental impact of this practice. However, due to pressure from different unions, the clause had to be deleted from the project.

Ban on Cryptocurrency Mining to Protect the Environment

Environmental advocates say the industry, drawn to Pennsylvania by cheap energy and tax incentives, poses a threat to the state’s climate goals and ecology. Due to the above, a two-year ban on cryptocurrency mining was contemplated.

However, the Pennsylvania House Environmental Energy and Resources Committee approved the “Cryptocurrency Energy Conservation Act,” the bill that included this provision. The approval was successful when it was learned that the clause mentioned above was deleted.

According to Representative Vitali, this measure was intended to be a relief for the environment. However, it received “chronic opposition” from construction unions.

“I think I learned the hard way in my first six months as majority speaker that there is no high tolerance for strong environmental policy… not even in my own group.”

With this temporary mining ban measure, the legislator intended to stop approvals of new and renewed permits to operate a cryptocurrency mining facility. After the elimination of said clause, the project is now limited to indicating the impact study on the miners’ operations.

Bitcoin or cryptocurrency mining is the process of verifying and adding transactions to the blockchain of the public Bitcoin network. This process is carried out by miners who use powerful computers that perform complex calculations to solve mathematical problems. In exchange for this, they are rewarded with newly created BTC.

The mining process requires the use of a lot of energy and, as a result, has raised concerns about its environmental impact.

New Tactics in Pennsylvania Instead of Opting for Mining Ban?

In August 2023, the Stronghold company was reported to have submitted an application to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). It involved a proposal to burn shredded tires as an alternative fuel source at its Nesquehoning plant.

Such measure aims to reduce the immense energy consumption involved in Bitcoin mining, a process that requires powerful machines that work 24 hours a day to solve complex algorithms. Without a doubt, this is a good alternative to the environmental and energy consumption problem that the practice of mining cryptocurrencies represents.

U.S. lawmakers are increasingly wary of crypto mining and its energy implications, and New York imposed a two-year moratorium on new energy sources to directly power crypto mining facilities, while allowing the state to collect data on such operations.

By Audy Castaneda

SBF’s Trial: Moral Sense or Billion Dollars, Nishad Singh’s Heart Races

Former FTX engineering director Nishad Singh reportedly testified that SBF “unilaterally spent Alameda’s money” and was “ultimately” in charge of the company instead of Caroline Ellison.

Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial continues and the third week of interrogations began yesterday, in a case during which the accused main colleagues came to testify at the bar. The objective was to show how he committed a miriad of crimes in direct association with the former CEO of the FTX platform. In what could be compared to episode S03E01 of this series of twists, it was the turn of the idealist. Nishad Singh comes and clears his conscience.

Nishad Singh Had a Problem with Sam Bankman-Fried’s “Excessive” Approach

The interrogations follow one another and are very similar in this already emblematic Sam Bankman-Fried’s trail. In fact, his former colleagues and employees are all on the same page about confronting the former FTX CEO with his criminal acts. At last, a pattern emerges from this obscene breakdown of revelations. with billions of dollars. The one the media liked to call the youngest billionaire on the planet had lost all contact with reality.

This was highlighted in the former engineering director of the FTX platform’s statements made yesterday. Indeed, Nishad Singh is considered in this file as an active member of the decision-makers’ restricted circle of this nebula with dark outlines. However, contrary to the case of Carolina Ellison O Gary Wang, Singh was immediately presented by the prosecutor as the last moral defense still standing in the face of the numerous detours of this ship in trouble, an uncomfortable position for the young man.

Singh, however, showered like the others with billions of dollars from FTX clients, all with the help of loans of enormous amounts. However, his guilty conscience finally pushed him to try – in vain – to resign.

SBF at the Head of Trade Agreements for Billions of Dollars

From the top of his scratched good conscience, Nishad Singh seems to have a fairly complete view of the questionable practices related to the management of the FTX platform.

In fact, during his interrogation he returned to the numerous agreements that Sam Bankman-Fried had established with important personalities, a file once again worth more than a billion dollars. There are names like the Miami Heat, Steph Curry, Kevin O’Leary, Tom Brady, the model Gisele Bundchen, the actor Larry Davidm, or the “supernetworkers” Michael Kives, and Bryan Baum through their company K5 Global.

It was with the help of a simple spreadsheet that Nishad Singh listed the $135 million invested to rename a famous Miami sports complex to FTX Arena. Addtionally, it is worth mentioning the #28 million paid to the basketball player Steph Curry, or even the billion dollars that Sam Bankman-Fried wanted to invest in K5 Global venture capital company.

“Sam sent Gary and me a term sheet to give millions in bonuses to Michael Kives and Bryan Baum, as well as a billion investment in this venture capital firm. I asked that this be done with Sam’s money and not FTX’s money. »

Evidently, all these operations were carried out within the framework of organized fraud with the FTX platform clients’ funds. Suffice it to say that the many beneficiaries of Sam Bankman-Fried’s generosity must break out in a cold sweat at the mention of their names.

By Leonardo Pérez

USDT Freeze: Tether Blocks $873,000 Related to Terrorist Activities in Ukraine and Israel

Tether reveals it blocked 32 wallet addresses linked to terrorist groups in Israel and Ukraine. To date, the USDT issuer has frozen more than $800 million worldwide. Binance collaborated with Israeli authorities to freeze accounts linked to Hamas

On Monday, USDT issuer Tether announced the freezing of 32 crypto wallet addresses. Together, these addresses contain $873,118 and are believed to be associated with “terrorism and war” related activities in Ukraine and Israel. The freezing of these crypto wallet addresses underscores the growing importance of regulatory compliance and security in the cryptocurrency space.

Stablecoin issuers, in particular, face increasing pressure from governments and financial institutions to ensure their digital assets are not used for illegal or harmful purposes. This measure also highlights the need to improve due diligence and monitoring of crypto transactions, as it can help detect and prevent potential misuse of digital currencies for nefarious activities.

No to Terrorism: USDT Account Blocking

Israeli police recently revealed that they have taken steps to freeze cryptocurrency accounts that were used for the purpose of soliciting donations for Hamas through various social media platforms.

The attack, carried out by the terrorist group on October 7, led to the loss of 1,300 lives in Israel. Israel’s National Terrorist Financing Office has reportedly been working with Tether, the company behind the world’s largest stablecoin, on their joint venture.

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino emphasized that blockchain platforms simplify the tracking of cryptocurrency transactions, allowing Tether to help prevent the use of USDT associated with terrorist financing.

Cryptocurrencies primarily operate beyond the boundaries of the conventional financial system, and the use of wallet addresses with pseudonymous characteristics makes it difficult to track the people responsible for transactions.

“Contrary to popular belief, cryptocurrency transactions are not anonymous; they are the most traceable assets,” Ardoino said.

“Tether remains committed to promoting the responsible use of blockchain technology and positioning itself as a strong defense against cybercrime. We eagerly anticipate continued collaboration with global law enforcement agencies as part of our commitment to global security and integrity,” Ardoino further explained.

In a blog post published in February, TRM Labs, a prominent blockchain analysis firm that collaborates with law enforcement authorities, stated that USDT has become a preferred currency to facilitate terrorist financing.

Collaborative Efforts with Binance: Disrupting Terrorist Financing

In the latter part of 2022, Tether implemented an asset freeze totaling over $360 million. The company subsequently reissued more than $100 million worth of USDT that had previously been intercepted.

In a broader context, these actions reflect a growing trend within the cryptocurrency space. Binance, another major player in the industry, has been actively collaborating with Israeli authorities to freeze cryptocurrency accounts associated with the Hamas group, thereby disrupting its financial resources critical to its operations.

Binance’s efforts also resulted in the seizure of 190 accounts linked to Islamic terrorist activities, underscoring the cryptocurrency sector’s commitment to addressing global security concerns and preventing the potential misuse of digital assets for illicit purposes.

Since the Russian invasion last year, cryptocurrencies have been widely used in Ukraine, with Kyiv raising more than $100 million in cryptocurrency after soliciting donations. Pro-Russian militants have used cryptocurrencies to raise funds in eastern Ukraine, according to blockchain researcher Chainalysis last year.

USDT, issued by Tether, is the largest stablecoin by market cap, with a current valuation of $83 billion.

By Audy Castaneda