Joules To Wavelength Calculator, Baldwin County, Alabama Obituaries, Wrecks In Tuscaloosa County Today, Wptf Morning Crew, Amazing Race Twins Derek And Drew, Articles C

The Mayor and the City (collectively, the City Parties) asserted in Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction and/or Counter-Motion For Summary Judgment (the Hybrid Motion) that (1) the trial court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over all of the Pidgeon Parties' claims because the City Parties enjoy immunity from suit under the doctrine of governmental immunity; (2) the trial court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the Pidgeon Parties' claw back claim because the Pidgeon Parties do not have standing to seek claw back of public funds already spent; (3) as a matter of law the Pidgeon Parties are not entitled to any declaratory relief or attorney's fees; and (4) as a matter of law the Pidgeon Parties are not entitled to any injunctive relief. on the 20th day after the date you were served with the citation. 2510, 125 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993) (explaining a decision extending the benefit of the judgment to the winning party is to be applied to other litigants whose cases were not final at the time of the first decision whether such event predate or postdate our announcement of the decision) (quotation and alteration omitted). Civ. TX Supreme Court Opinions and Cases | FindLaw Whether the Mayor or City violated state or local law in the past or is violating it now in providing spousal benefits to same-sex spouses is legally irrelevant if the City was under federal court order to do so on the date the lawsuit was filed. Additionally, we take judicial notice that the State now follows Obergefell in providing employee benefits to same-sex spouses of state employees. Specifically, appellants sought to enjoin the mayor and the city to comply with section 6.204(c)(2) of the Texas Family Code.. The clerk also attends each court docket in support of the court. The Trial Court Should Have Denied Defendant's Plea to Jurisdiction, II. Broadway's Longest-Running Musical Turns Out the Lights On 03/07/2018 DINH, STEVEN filed a Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle lawsuit against CITY OF HOUSTON. Because the challenged directive in this case is not a legislative pronouncement, the waiver of immunity under the Texas Declaratory Judgments Act does not apply to the Pidgeon Parties' claims. In this interlocutory appeal, 1 the City of Houston appeals the denial of its motion for summary judgment contending that governmental immunity shielded it from the lawsuit filed by Appellees, Catrennia Foreman Sauls, individually and as representative of the estate of her late . While the Court recognized that a state is free to decide in the first instance what benefits flow from marriage, once that question is decided, Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses preclude states from denying married same-sex couples the constellation of benefits that States have linked to marriage. See Obergefell, 576 U.S. at 64647, 135 S.Ct.